Negotiating the Researcher: Interstitial, Appropriated, and Digital Identities in Media Production Ethnography

  • Ekdale B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While all people form, exhibit, and use multiple identities, the hybridity of identity plays an integral role in the production of ethnographic knowledge. This article explores three critical tensions concerning researcher identity in media production ethnographies. First, I argue ethnographer identity is interstitial, situated at the margins of contesting and, at times, divergent selves. Second, while researchers privilege certain selves and favor particular agendas, others can appropriate and promote certain aspects of the researcher’s identity to serve strategic purposes. Finally, the rise of digital and social media has complicated traditional notions of identity management and ‘the field’ and provides new opportunities for participants to study the researcher. Thus, while acts of identity are exertions of power, that power can be harnessed and enacted by both researchers and participants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ekdale, B. (2017). Negotiating the Researcher: Interstitial, Appropriated, and Digital Identities in Media Production Ethnography. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free