Comparison of central venous catheterization sites in infants

15Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the rates of success and complications between different sites of central venous catheterization in infants. A total of 272 infants were randomized to four groups: right subclavian group (G-RSCV), right internal jugular group (G-RIJV), left subclavian group (G-LSCV) and left internal jugular vein group (G-LIJV). In 77.2% of the patients, we successfully introduced a catheter at the first attempt. The rate of successful catheter placement was highest in the RIJV (RIJV 89.7%, LIJV 79.4%, RSCV 66.2% and LSCV 55.9%). With regard to complications, the rate of arterial puncture, guide wire advancement failure and malpositioning of the catheter were all significantly more frequent during SCV catheterization (SCV versus IJV: 10.1% versus 2.1%, 12.4% versus 0% and 13.4% versus 0.6%, respectively). Our results imply that IJV, especially RIJV, should be the first choice for central venous catheterization in infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, S. H., Kim, S. D., Kim, C. S., Kim, W. H., Lim, C., Park, Y. S., & Bahk, J. H. (2004). Comparison of central venous catheterization sites in infants. Journal of International Medical Research, 32(6), 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000403200601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free