Theagendaof disinformation: “fake news” and membership categorization analysis in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the main aspects of public debate in Brazil in the period that preceded the 2018 presidential elections was the dissemination of false stories via social media and messaging apps. Disinformation, misinformation, and mal-information - phenomena that comprehend elements such as wrongful, out of context, distorted and fabricated information, among others - were a major concern in the election, highlighted by the number of false stories debunked by independent fact-checkers. In the 20-day period between the two rounds of the presidential election, six fact-checking websites posted 228 verifications of false stories disseminated on social media and/or messaging apps, covering a range of about 132 different topics. This article aims to analyze the categorizations enunciated in their discourses. In order to do so, the methodological perspective utilized was the Membership Categorization Analysis, affiliated with the tradition of Ethnomethodology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaves, M., & Braga, A. (2019). Theagendaof disinformation: “fake news” and membership categorization analysis in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections. Brazilian Journalism Research, 15(3), 474–495. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v15n3.2019.1187

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free