Incidence rate of prostate cancer in men treated for erectile dysfunction with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: Retrospective analysis

32Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence rate of prostate cancer among men with erectile dysfunction (ED) treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) over a 7-year period vs. men with ED of the same age and with similar risk factors who were not treated with PDE-5i. In a retrospective review of electronic medical records and billing databases between the years 2000 and 2006, men with ED between the ages of 50 and 69 years and no history of prostate cancer prior to 2000 were identified. These individuals were divided into two groups: 2362 men who had treatment with PDE-5i, and 2612 men who did not have treatment. Demographic data in each group were compared. During the study period, 97 (4.1%) men with ED treated with PDE-5i were diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with 258 (9.9%) men with ED in the non-treated group (P<00001). A higher percentage of African Americans were treated with PDE-5i vs. those who were not (10.5% vs. 7.1%; P<0.0001). The PDE-5i group had lower documented diagnosis of elevated prostate-specific antigen (10.0% vs. 13.1%; P=0.0008) and higher percentage of benign prostatic hyperplasia (38.4% vs. 35.1%; P=0.0149). Men with ED treated with PDE-5i tended to have less chance (adjusted odds ratio: 0.4; 95% confidence intervals: 0.3-0.5; P<0.0001) of having prostate cancer. Our data suggest that men with ED treated with PDE-5i tended to have less of a chance of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. Further research is warranted. © 2013 AJA, SIMM & SJTU. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chavez, A. H., Scott Coffield, K., Hasan Rajab, M., & Jo, C. (2013). Incidence rate of prostate cancer in men treated for erectile dysfunction with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: Retrospective analysis. Asian Journal of Andrology, 15(2), 246–248. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2012.162

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free