The labour market flexibility debate in India: Re-examining the case for signing voluntary contracts

6Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A major focus of India's ongoing policy debate over labour market flexibilization has been the statutory requirement that firms employing 100 or more workers cannot dismiss employees without prior government permission. The case for repealing that requirement (or greatly increasing the workforce threshold) is notably underpinned by Basu, Fields and Debgupta (2009). Here, the author challenges their particular theoretical argument for hiring and firing at will based on the voluntary signing of contracts, demonstrating that their general policy conclusion is logically unsustainable even within the framework of that model. The case for labour market flexibilization through voluntary contracting thus remains unfounded.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roychowdhury, A. (2014, September 1). The labour market flexibility debate in India: Re-examining the case for signing voluntary contracts. International Labour Review. International Labour Office. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00008.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free