Evaluating de Bruijn Graph Assemblers on 454 Transcriptomic Data

23Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have greatly changed the landscape of transcriptomic studies of non-model organisms. Since there is no reference genome available, de novo assembly methods play key roles in the analysis of these data sets. Because of the huge amount of data generated by NGS technologies for each run, many assemblers, e.g., ABySS, Velvet and Trinity, are developed based on a de Bruijn graph due to its time- and space-efficiency. However, most of these assemblers were developed initially for the Illumina/Solexa platform. The performance of these assemblers on 454 transcriptomic data is unknown. In this study, we evaluated and compared the relative performance of these de Bruijn graph based assemblers on both simulated and real 454 transcriptomic data. The results suggest that Trinity, the Illumina/Solexa-specialized transcriptomic assembler, performs the best among the multiple de Bruijn graph assemblers, comparable to or even outperforming the standard 454 assembler Newbler which is based on the overlap-layout-consensus algorithm. Our evaluation is expected to provide helpful guidance for researchers to choose assemblers when analyzing 454 transcriptomic data. © 2012 Ren et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ren, X., Liu, T., Dong, J., Sun, L., Yang, J., Zhu, Y., & Jin, Q. (2012). Evaluating de Bruijn Graph Assemblers on 454 Transcriptomic Data. PLoS ONE, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free