Tsunamis from strike-slip earthquakes in theWharton Basin, northeast Indian Ocean: March 2016Mw7.8 event and its relationship with the April 2012Mw 8.6 event

34Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Wharton Basin, off southwest Sumatra, ruptured to a large intraplate left-lateral strikeslip Mw 7.8 earthquake on 2016 March 2. The epicentre was located ~800 km to the south of another similar-mechanism intraplate Mw 8.6 earthquake in the same basin on 2012 April 11. Small tsunamis from these strike-slip earthquakes were registered with maximum amplitudes of 0.5-1.5 cm on DARTs and 1-19 cm on tide gauges for the 2016 event, and the respective values of 0.5-6 and 6-40 cm for the 2012 event. By using both teleseismic body waves and tsunami observations of the 2016 event, we obtained optimum slip models with rupture velocity (Vr ) in the range of 2.8-3.6 kms-1 belonging to both EWand NS faults.While the EW fault plane cannot be fully ruled out, we chose the best model as the NS fault plane with a Vr of 3.6 km s-1, a maximum slip of 7.7 m and source duration of 33 s. The tsunami energy period bands were 4-15 and 7-24 min for the 2016 and 2012 tsunamis, respectively, reflecting the difference in source sizes. Seismicity in the Wharton Basin is dominated by large strike-slip events including the 2012 (Mw 8.6 and 8.2) and 2016 (Mw 7.8) events, indicating that these events are possible tsunami sources in theWharton Basin. Cumulative number and cumulative seismic-moment curves revealed that most earthquakes are of strike-slip mechanisms and the largest seismic-moment is provided by the strike-slip earthquakes in this basin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heidarzadeh, M., Harada, T., Satake, K., Ishibe, T., & Takagawa, T. (2017). Tsunamis from strike-slip earthquakes in theWharton Basin, northeast Indian Ocean: March 2016Mw7.8 event and its relationship with the April 2012Mw 8.6 event. Geophysical Journal International, 211(3), 1601–1612. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free