Symbolic technologies: Machines and the Marxian notion of fetishism

33Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

By extending the Marxian theory of fetishism from money and commodities to machines, we may achieve an epistemological shift in our understanding of the foundations of 'technological development'. The first part of the article discusses previous definitions of fetishism in order to distil some central themes that appear to be particularly significant to the argument on machine fetishism. It is argued that semiotic theory can be useful in distinguishing different varieties of fetishism. The core of the Marxian definition is understood to be the mystification of unequal relations of social exchange through the attribution of autonomous agency or productivity to certain kinds of material objects. The attribution of productivity to modern technology is here interpreted as a mystification of the unequal, global exchange of (labour) time and (natural) space. Copyright © Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hornborg, A. (2001). Symbolic technologies: Machines and the Marxian notion of fetishism. Anthropological Theory, 1(4), 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/14634990122228854

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free