Excellence in PhD dissertations in health professions education: Toward standards and expectations

9Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The authors of this perspective contribution have served two terms (2014 and 2016) in the Jury of the biennial Best PhD Dissertation Award committee of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education. During this period, the committee reviewed 32 dissertations. Based on discussions among the jury regarding elements of an award winning dissertation and existing literature, we propose seven criteria to evaluate PhD dissertations: size, breadth of research skills exhibited, coherence of studies, relevance to field, validity, style, communicative power and ethics, and impact of the work. We anticipate these may not only assist similar committees but also provide criteria of excellence for future doctoral work in health professions education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

ten Cate, O., Derese, A., Durning, S. J., & O’Sullivan, P. (2017). Excellence in PhD dissertations in health professions education: Toward standards and expectations. Medical Teacher, 39(9), 926–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1302573

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free