DETERMINANTS FACTORS OF A GOING CONCERN AUDIT OPINION: A RISK GOVERNANCE AND REGULATION IMPLICATION

5Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) mandate auditors to evaluate the client’s capability to sustain her/his operations for a reasonable period after the financial statement’s date (Geiger et al., 2021). The current study examines the determinants predicting going concern audit opinions (GCAOs) for the period from 2018 to 2022. Data was collected manually through the financial reports and the external auditor’s report published on the website of the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). Using binary logistic regression, profitability and liquidity were found to have a significant inverse impact on GCAOs, while leverage showed a positive impact. Unexpectedly, audit lag did not show a significant impact on GCAOs. The findings highlight the important role of financial indicators in evaluating the going concern assumption. The results are robust to concerns the determinants of a going concern audit opinion and provide valuable insights to academics, shareholders, companies, and regulators from a developing market. This study recommends that managers need to take these relationships into account when making strategic decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altawalbeh, M. A. (2025). DETERMINANTS FACTORS OF A GOING CONCERN AUDIT OPINION: A RISK GOVERNANCE AND REGULATION IMPLICATION. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 15(1), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv15i1sip4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free