Benchmarking small-variant genotyping in polyploids

13Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Genotyping from sequencing is the basis of emerging strategies in the molecular breeding of polyploid plants. However, compared with the situation for diploids, in which genotyping accuracies are confidently determined with comprehensive benchmarks, polyploids have been neglected; there are no benchmarks measuring genotyping error rates for small variants using real sequencing reads. We previously introduced a variant calling method, Octopus, that accurately calls germline variants in diploids and somatic mutations in tumors. Here, we evaluate Octopus and other popular tools on whole-genome tetraploid and hexaploid data sets created using in silico mixtures of diploid Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) samples. We find that genotyping errors are abundant for typical sequencing depths but that Octopus makes 25% fewer errors than other methods on average. We supplement our benchmarks with concordance analysis in real autotriploid banana data sets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooke, D. P., Wedge, D. C., & Lunter, G. (2022). Benchmarking small-variant genotyping in polyploids. Genome Research, 32(2), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1101/GR.275579.121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free