Randomized controlled trial of ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid in huntington disease

106Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid (ethyl-EPA), an ω-3 fatty acid, improves the motor features of Huntington disease. Design: Six-monthmulticenter,randomized,double-blind, placebo-controlled trial followed by a 6-month open-label phase without disclosing initial treatment assignments. Setting: Forty-one research sites in the United States and Canada. Patients: Three hundred sixteen adults with Huntington disease, enriched for a population with shorter trinucleotide (cytosine-adenine-guanine) repeat length expansions. Interventions: Random assignment to placebo or ethyl- EPA, 1 g twice a day, followed by open-label treatment with ethyl-EPA. Main Outcome Measures: Six-month change in the Total Motor Score 4 component of the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale analyzed for all research participants and those with shorter cytosine-adenineguanine repeat length expansions (< 45). Results: At 6 months, the Total Motor Score 4 point change for patients receiving ethyl-EPA did not differ from that for those receiving placebo. No differences were found in measures of function, cognition, or global impression. Before public disclosure of the 6-month placebo-controlled results, 192 individuals completed the open-label phase. The Total Motor Score 4 change did not worsen for those who received active treatment for 12 continuous months compared with those who received active treatment for only 6 months (2.0-point worsening; P=.02). Conclusion: Ethyl-EPA was not beneficial in patients with Huntington disease during 6 months of placebocontrolled evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorsey, E. R., Shoulson, I., Leavitt, B., Ross, C., Beck, C. A., de Blieck, E. A., … Wheelock, V. (2008). Randomized controlled trial of ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid in huntington disease. Archives of Neurology, 65(12), 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.65.12.1582

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free