Gravity Current Flow Over Obstacles

110Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When a gravity current meets an obstacle a proportion of the flow may continue over the obstacle while the rest is reflected back as a hydraulic jump. There are many examples of this type of flow, both in the natural and man-made environment (e.g. sea breezes meeting hills, dense gas and liquid releases meeting containment walls). Two-dimensional currents and obstacles, where the reflected jump is in the opposite direction to the incoming current, are examined by laboratory experiment and theoretical analysis. The investigation concentrates on the case of no net flow, so that there is a return flow in the (finite depth) upper layer. The theoretical analysis is based on shallow-water theory. Both a rigid lid and a free surface condition for the top of the upper layer are considered. The flow may be divided into several regions: the inflow conditions, the region around the hydraulic jump, the flow at the obstacle and the flow downstream of the obstacle. Both theoretical and empirical inflow conditions are examined; the jump conditions are based on assuming that the energy dissipation is confined to the lower layer; and the flow over the obstacle is described by hydraulic control theory. The predictions for the proportion of the flow that continues over the obstacle, the speed of the reflected jump and the depth of the reflected flow are compared with the laboratory experiments, and give reasonable agreement. A shallower upper layer (which must result in a faster return velocity in the upper layer) is found to have a significant effect, both on the initial incoming gravity current and on the proportion of the flow that continues over the obstacle. © 1995, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lane-Serff, G. F., Beai, L. M., & Hadfield, T. D. (1995). Gravity Current Flow Over Obstacles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 292, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211209500142X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free