Erratum to: Skepticism, cynicism, and cognitive style predictors of the generality of unsubstantiated belief (Applied Cognitive Psychology, (2022), 36, 1, (83-99), 10.1002/acp.3900)

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Subsequent to publication, errors were identified in Table 3 under M (for means) row and on the second sentence of the second paragraph of sub-section ‘3.3.2 Generality of dispositional predictors’ of Bensley et al.1 Table 3 and the second sentence of the second paragraph of sub-section 3.3.2 have been corrected below. 3 TABLE Pilot study intercorrelations of unsubstantiated belief measures and individual difference predictors (Table presented.) Note: Misconceptions = TOPKAM misconceptions; Paranormal Belief = Revised Paranormal Belief Scale-adapted; Conspiracy Beliefs = False and Fictitious Specific Conspiracy Theory Beliefs; REI Rationality = REI Rational-analytic Scale; REI Intuitive = REI Intuitive-experiential Scale. * p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bensley, D. A., Watkins, C., Lilienfeld, S. O., Masciocchi, C., Murtagh, M. P., & Rowan, K. (2022, March 1). Erratum to: Skepticism, cynicism, and cognitive style predictors of the generality of unsubstantiated belief (Applied Cognitive Psychology, (2022), 36, 1, (83-99), 10.1002/acp.3900). Applied Cognitive Psychology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free