Abstract
A prospective randomised phase III study in patients ≤65 years old with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM), intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell rescue was compared with intensive chemotherapy alone. This economic evaluation was based on detailed data from patient charts and hospital information systems. In the intention-to-treat analysis, mean total treatment and follow-up costs of the myeloablative treatment arm were €81,643 compared to €68,802 for the chemotherapy arm (P=0.09). Costs per quality-adjusted life year were €51,357 versus €37,328. In the clinical study, no significant differences were found in overall survival after a median follow-up of 33 months from randomisation. Intensive chemotherapy is regarded as standard therapy for younger patients with previously untreated MM. Cost-effectiveness of myeloma therapy after 3 years of follow up seems not to be favoured by myeloablative treatment with autologous stem-cell rescue. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Van Agthoven, M., Segeren, C. M., Buijt, I., Uyl-De Groot, C. A., Van Der Holt, B., Lokhorst, H. M., & Sonneveld, P. (2004). A cost-utility analysis comparing intensive chemotherapy alone to intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in newly diagnosed patients with stage II/III multiple myeloma: A prospective randomised phase III study. European Journal of Cancer, 40(8), 1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.019
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.