Comparative histochemistry of port-wine stains after copper vapor laser (578 nm) and argon laser treatment

58Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present study compared the histologic changes occurring 15 min after copper vapor laser (CVL; operating at 578 nm) and argon laser (488/514 nm) treatment of portwine stains (PWS) over a range of energy densities (8-32 J/cm2) with corresponding pulse widths of 50-200 ms. Frozen tissue sections were stained with nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBTC). This histochemical method permits an accurate color differentiation between blue-stained viable and unstained thermally damaged cells. At 8, 10, and 12 J/cm2 the argon-laser injury was confined to epidermal cell layers; none to superficial dermal effects were found. Fluences of at least 15 J/cm2 produced a diffuse NBTC-negative coagulation necrosis. Exposure of PWS skin to 8-12 J/cm2 at 578 nm did not alter the integrity of epidermal cells. In the dermis, damage was confined to blood vessels and surrounding collagen, showing a clear demarcation from adjacent viable structures. The maximum penetration depth achieved with these vessel selective energy densities was 0.44 mm. At 15 J/cm2, besides vascular injury, damage to the basal cell layer also occurred. At fluences of 17-20 J/cm2 a diffuse necrosis similar to that induced by the argon laser was found. Vessel selectivity of the 578 nm wave band was achieved with pulse widths from 50-74 ms, exceeding the estimated "ideal" exposure time (0.1-10.0 ms) for a vascular selective laser effect. The NBTC method allowed identification of subtle laser-induced tissue changes providing accurate quantitative data relating to the extent of vascular injury. © 1992.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reinhard Anton, N., Robert Martin, K., Leonhartsberger, H., & Gebhart, W. (1992). Comparative histochemistry of port-wine stains after copper vapor laser (578 nm) and argon laser treatment. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 99(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12616789

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free