ATIM-38. PHASE 2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MEDI4736 (DURVALUMAB, DURVA) + BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) IN BEV-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

  • Reardon D
  • Kaley T
  • Dietrich J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Durva is a human IgG1 mAb against PD-L1. Blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 has shown benefit among solid tumors; data implicate PD-1/PD-L1 signaling as a significant contributor to immunosuppression in GBM. BEV is an approved angiogenesis inhibitor for recurrent GBM; angiogenesis inhibition may promote antitumor benefit of immunotherapies. A review showed that lower dose BEV resulted in longer PFS/OS than the standard. METHOD(S): Ongoing Phase 2 open-label study (NCT02336165) evaluates safety and efficacy of durva (10mg/kg Q2W) in 5 GBM cohorts. Results are presented for Cohorts B2 (durva + BEV 10mg/kg Q2W) and B3 (durva +BEV 3mg/kg Q2W) in BEV-naive recurrent GBM. Primary efficacy endpoint for Cohorts B2/B3 is 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6), by modified RANO per investigator assessment; secondary endpoints include safety/tolerability. Comparative benchmark for BEV in recurrent GBM is PFS6 of 42%. The null hypothesis (PFS6 =62%). ITT includes patients receiving any dose of durva and having at least baseline and 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. Durva alone in Cohort B of this study demonstrated PFS6 of 20% (90% CI: 9.7, 33.0). RESULT(S): As of 02Apr2018, 33 patients were treated in each cohort (B2, male: 54.5%, median age: 57.0 [40-74] years; B3, male: 60.6%, median age: 54.0 [23- 73] years). Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, in >=4 [12.1%] patients in either cohort): fatigue, dysphonia, increased ALT, AST, amylase, or lipase, diarrhea, hypertension, arthralgia, headache, and proteinuria. Incidences of TRAEs by maximum CTCAE grade (Gr) >=3 for Cohorts B2/B3 were Gr3: 24.2/6.1%; Gr4: 0/6.1%; and Gr5: 0/0%. Kaplan- Meier estimate for PFS6 (n=33 each): B2, 15.2% (80% CI: 8.2, 24.0); B3, 21.1% (80% CI: 12.4, 31.4); 3 patients in each cohort showed partial response. CONCLUSION(S): The addition of durva to BEV did not improve on the outcome of durva alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reardon, D., Kaley, T., Dietrich, J., Clarke, J., Dunn, G., Lim, M., … Venhaus, R. (2018). ATIM-38. PHASE 2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MEDI4736 (DURVALUMAB, DURVA) + BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) IN BEV-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM). Neuro-Oncology, 20(suppl_6), vi10–vi10. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy148.033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free