P09.08 Hypofractionated versus standard radiotherapy with or without temozolomide for elderly patients with glioblastoma

  • Gkogkou P
  • Hamm S
  • Geropantas K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of patients aged ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB) is evolving. In the UK, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT: 30 Gy in 6 fractions over 2 weeks) has been the standard of care for individuals aged >70 years with PS=0-1, any age with PS≥2, and/or multifocal tumours. Occasionally, patients aged >70 years with PS 0-1 and no medical comorbidities may be considered for standard radiotherapy (SRT-60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) with or without temozolomide (TMZ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study we analysed the outcome of radiotherapy for patients aged ≥ 65 years with glioblastoma treated between 2009 and 2015. Survival was calculated the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in patient-and disease-related factors between the HRT and SRT groups were compared using the Fisher exact test. The Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis was used to correlate these factors with survival. RESULTS: Patients received HRT (n=45), SRT (n= 8) or SRT with TMZ (n=15). The median age was 71.5 years (range: 65 to 83 years). 30 patients were aged 65-70 years and 38 were >70 years. 35 patients underwent debulking surgery and the remaining had either a biopsy (n=29) or a radiological diagnosis (n=4). 21 patients had multifocal disease. Patients receiving HRT were significantly older (median age 75 years vs. 69 years, p=0.003), had worse PS (≥2) (p=0.000), and the majority had only a biopsy or radiological diagnosis (p=0.021), compared with those receiving SRT with or without temozolomide Patients who received SRT+/-TMZ had a better median overall (11 vs. 5 months; p=0.000) and progression-free survival (9 vs. 3 months, p=0.040) compared with patients who received HRT. The corresponding 1-year OS for both groups were 43.5% and 6.7% respectively. On univariate analysis, overall survival correlated with PS (HR=0.42, 95% CI:0.24-0.74), multifocality (HR=2.07, 95% CI 1.21-3.55), and age (HR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.99-1.09), but not with the extent of resection (HR=1.44, 95% CI 0.95-2.18). MGMT methylation status was not available for all patients and therefore, not analysed. CONCLUSION: SRT with or without TMZ may improve survival in selected patients aged ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The survival of patients treated with SRT+/-TMZ in our cohort is better than that of patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy in the recently published EORTC 26062-22061 study. An individualised-approach should be favoured over a one-fits-all strategy in the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gkogkou, P., Hamm, S., Geropantas, K., Ajithkumar, T., & Jefferies, S. (2017). P09.08 Hypofractionated versus standard radiotherapy with or without temozolomide for elderly patients with glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology, 19(suppl_3), iii71–iii71. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox036.266

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free