Phase i dose-escalation study of aflibercept in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

18Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This phase I cohort study investigated aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) trap) plus docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.Methods:Patients received intravenous aflibercept 4, 5, or 6 mg kg-1 with docetaxel and cisplatin (75 mg m-2 each) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were determining cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the aflibercept recommended phase II trial dose (RP2D) for this combination.Results:During the dose-escalation phase (n16), there were two DLTs of febrile neutropenia (at 4 and 5 mg kg-1). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis was subsequently recommended. The RP2D of aflibercept was established at 6 mg kg-1 and administered to 14 additional patients. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (43.3%), stomatitis (20.0%), asthenia/fatigue (20.0%), and hypertension (16.7%). All-grade AEs associated with VEGF blockade included epistaxis (83.3%), dysphonia (70.0%), proteinuria (53.3%), and hypertension (50.0%). There were five partial responses (16.7%) and 18 cases of stable disease (60.0%) (lasting 3 months in 10 patients). There were no pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the three drugs.Conclusion:Aflibercept 6 mg kg -1 with docetaxel and cisplatin 75 mg m-2 every 3 weeks is the RP2D based on tolerability, antitumour activity, and PKs. © 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freyer, G., Isambert, N., You, B., Zanetta, S., Falandry, C., Favier, L., … Fumoleau, P. (2012). Phase i dose-escalation study of aflibercept in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours. British Journal of Cancer, 107(4), 598–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free