Double dissociation between perspective-taking and empathic-concern as predictors of hemodynamic response to another's mistakes

19Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Identifying another's mistakes requires a basic representation of other's action patterns as well as recognition and understanding of their failed goal-attainment. In previous work, we identified several regions, including inferior parietal cortex and rostral/ventral anterior cinguli (r/vACC), that show unique sensitivity to the observation of another's errors. Here we utilize the same sample to show that participants' level of self-reported perspective-taking (but not empathic concern) correlated with hemodynamic response in IPC, while participants' level of self-reported empathic concern (but not perspective taking) correlated with hemodynamic response in r/vACC. This functional dissociation provides strong evidence for separate roles for IPC and r/vACC in the processing of observed errors. IPC may foster a sense of agency by distinguishing self- from other-performed actions; r/vACC may, in turn, promote a more contextually-mediated understanding of the other's failed goal-attainment. © The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shane, M. S., Stevens, M. C., Harenski, C. L., & Kiehl, K. A. (2009). Double dissociation between perspective-taking and empathic-concern as predictors of hemodynamic response to another’s mistakes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free