Radial Head Replacement for Acute Radial Head Fractures: Outcome and Survival of Three Implant Designs with and without Cement Fixation

22Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To determine outcomes of radial head replacement (RHR) for acute fractures using 3 different implant designs with or without cement fixation. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Tertiary referral hospital. Patients/Participants: One hundred fourteen elbows underwent RHR for an acute radial head fracture using either (1) a nonanatomic design and smooth stem (n = 60), (2) a nonanatomic design with a grit-blasted, ingrowth, curved stem (n = 21), or (3) an anatomic design with a grit-blasted ingrowth straight stem (n = 33). Cemented (25%) or uncemented (75%) fixation was used at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Intervention: RHR. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome was implant survivorship free of revision or removal for any reason. All elbows were evaluated clinically (the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and reoperations/complications) and radiographically. Results: Fourteen implants (12%) were revised. Of elbows with a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up, the average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88. The rate of survivorship free from revision was 92% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 87%–98%] at 2 years, 90% (CI = 84%–96%) at 5 years and 84% (CI = 75%–94%) at 10 years. The differences in survivorship between the 3 implants did not reach statistical significance, but the nonanatomic design with a grit-blasted ingrowth curved stem had a hazard ratio of 4.6 (95% CI = 0.9%–23%) for failure. There were no differences in survivorship between cemented versus uncemented stems. For those elbows with a minimum of 2 years of radiographic follow-up, implant tilt was observed in 10 (16%) elbows and loosening in 16 (26%) elbows. Stress shielding was present in 19 (42%) of well-fixed implants. Conclusions: RHR for acute trauma leads to survivorship greater than 80% at 10 years. Radiographic changes (loosening, stress shielding, and implant tilting) can be expected in a substantial portion of elbows at long-term follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Songy, C. E., Kennon, J. C., Barlow, J. D., Sanchez-Sotelo, J., O’Driscoll, S. W., & Morrey, M. E. (2021). Radial Head Replacement for Acute Radial Head Fractures: Outcome and Survival of Three Implant Designs with and without Cement Fixation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 35(6), E202–E208. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001983

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free