Abstract
Stricker (2009), Grinfeld (2009), and Lampropoulos (2009) provide three types of commentary on my case of Ms. Q (Ingram, 2009): feedback on my handling of psychotherapy with this high-functioning client; critical evaluation of my “28 core clinical hypotheses” model; and discussion of where this model fits within four categories of integrative psychotherapy—common factors integration, theoretical integration, assimilative integration, and technical eclecticism. In this response I focus on each topic in turn, and conclude with a discussion of the training of clinical graduate students as integrationally-oriented psychotherapists.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ingram, B. L. (2009). Where Does the “Core Clinical Hypotheses” Model Fit Among Models of Integrative Psychotherapy? Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v5i1.962
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.