Virologic and immunologic effectiveness of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)- Versus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-based regimens in clinical practice

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Although both tipranavir and darunavir are important options for the management of patients with multidrug resistant HIV, there are at present no studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of these 2 antiretroviral drugs in this population of patients. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of ritonavir (TPV/r)- and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/ r)-based therapies in treatment-experienced patients (n = 38 and 47, respectively). Methods: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Results: The median baseline viral load and CD4 count were 4.7 copies/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 4.3, 5.2) and 168 cells/mm3 (IQR 80, 252) for TPV/r patients and 4.7 copies/mL (IQR 3.7, 5.1) and 171 cells/mm3 (IQR 92, 290) for DRV/r patients. The median number of years on antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to starting DRV/r or TPV/r were 12.7 (10.2-15.5) and 10.5 (8.4-12.6), respectively (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Antoniou, T., Raboud, J. M., Diong, C., Su, D., Dewhurst, N., Buckley, V., … Loutfy, M. R. (2010). Virologic and immunologic effectiveness of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)- Versus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-based regimens in clinical practice. Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care, 9(6), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545109710382041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free