Comparison of hypertonic saline solutions and dextran in dialysis-induced hypotension

30Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The efficacy of three hypertonic saline solutions for treating dialysis-induced hypotension in a randomized, blinded, crossover clinical trial of 10 patients (a minimum of three cycles per solution) was compared. Dialysis-induced hypotension, defined as a decrease in systolic blood pressure of at least 10 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg, was treated with an iv bolus of either 10 mL of 23% saturated hypertonic saline, 30 mL of 7.5% hypertonic saline, or 30 mL of 7.5% saline with 6% dextran 70, each containing similar osmolar loads of 80, 80, and 100 mosM, respectively. All three solutions raised systolic blood pressure within 5 min (mean pretreatment systolic blood pressure, 87 mm Hg; mean posttreatment systolic blood pressure, 101 mm Hg; P < 0.05). The magnitude of the increase was greater with saturated hypertonic saline (15 mm Hg) and dextran 70 (17 mm Hg) compared with that with hypertonic saline (9 mm Hg; P < 0.05). At 10 min, dialysis-induced hypotension was less frequent with saturated hypertonic saline (incidence, 9%) compared with Hypertonic saline (45%). Beyond 10 min, however, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of further dialysis-induced hypotension with dextran 70. There were no side effects. Given equal osmole loads, the more concentrated solution produced a greater increase in systolic blood pressure. The addition of an oncotic agent such as dextran may prolong the blood pressure response beyond 10 min. It was concluded that hypertonic saline solutions safely and effectively treat dialysis-induced hypotension.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gong, R., Lindberg, J., Abrams, J., Whitaker, W. R., Wade, C. E., & Gouge, S. (1992). Comparison of hypertonic saline solutions and dextran in dialysis-induced hypotension. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v3111808

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free