Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness for the placement of orthodontic miniscrews in adults with different facial types

13Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantitatively evaluate palatal bone thickness in adults with different facial types using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: The CBCT volumetric data of 123 adults (mean age, 26.8 years) collected between August 2014 and August 2016 was retrospectively studied. The subjects were divided into a low-angle group (39 subjects), a normal-angle group (48 subjects) and a high-angle group (36 subjects) based on facial types assigned by cephalometric radiography. The thickness of the palatal bone was assessed at designated points. A repeated-measure analysis of variance (rm-ANOVA) test was used to test the relationship between facial types and palatal bone thickness. Results: Compared to the low-angle group, the highangle group had significantly thinner palatal bones (p<0.05), except for the anterior-midline, anteriormedial and middle-midline areas. Conclusion: The safest zone for the placement of microimplants is the anterior part of the paramedian palate. Clinicians should pay special attention to the probability of thinner bone plates and the risk of perforation in high-angle patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y., Qiu, Y., Liu, H., He, J., & Fan, X. (2017). Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness for the placement of orthodontic miniscrews in adults with different facial types. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(10), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.10.20967

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free