The ‘Hybrid Turn’: Approaches and Potentials

  • Brown M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hybridity, the hybrid turn and hybrid political orders have become increasingly common as terms in debates around peacebuilding, state formation, governance and, to some extent, counter-insurgency and security in postcolonial states. While circulating in scholarly debate, where they are best exemplified in the work of Oliver Richmond,¹ Volker Boege, Roger Mac Ginty and others, these terms, or approaches associated with them, now also appear regularly in policy and practice arenas,² where they have emerged as part of a response to what is seen as the relative failure of many international postwar reconstruction, statebuilding and security interventions to establish stable, relatively

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, M. A. (2018). The ‘Hybrid Turn’: Approaches and Potentials. In Hybridity on the Ground in Peacebuilding and Development: Critical Conversations (pp. 21–36). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/hgpd.03.2018.01

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free