Fidaxomicin versus conventional antimicrobial therapy in 59 recipients of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

49Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The feasibility of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin and metronidazole (conventional therapy) was assessed in 59 transplant recipients with 61 episodes of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). Overall clinical cure was achieved in 86% of episodes, and in 7% of episodes, infection recurred. Fidaxomicin was well tolerated. Clinical cures were not significantly different compared with conventional therapy (67% versus 89%, respectively; P=0.06). Univariate analysis of predictors for lack of clinical cure included continued use of broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics (P=0.026) and prior diagnosis of CDAD (95% confidence interval, 1.113 to 19.569; odds ratio, 4.667; P=0.041). New-onset vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization was not noted after fidaxomicin therapy alone. However, this occurred in 10 of 28 patients (36%) following conventional therapy, and 2 of 3 patients with subsequent bacteremia died. Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clutter, D. S., Dubrovskaya, Y., Merl, M. Y., Teperman, L., Press, R., & Safdar, A. (2013). Fidaxomicin versus conventional antimicrobial therapy in 59 recipients of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 57(9), 4501–4505. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01120-13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free