Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: Can the WHO classification system be simplified?

170Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The WHO classification for well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) incorporates both stage and grade. This study compares the prognostic value of a simplified staging and grading system with the WHO system in a large single-institution study. Patients and Methods: A prospective database (1982 to 2005) identified 183 patients who underwent operative treatment for PENs. Tumors were staged (< 2 cm primary, ≥ 2 cm primary, or metastases) and graded (low grade: no necrosis and < 2 cm, 83%; ≥ 2 cm, 61%; metastases, 28%; P < .001). The WHO classification, tumor stage, and grade were associated with 5-year DSS (P < .001). Tumors ≥ 2 cm or metastases are stratified by grade (5-year DSS rate for low v intermediate grade: ≥ 2 cm, 97% v 80%, respectively; P < .001; metastases, 93% v 62%, respectively; P = .05). The CI was 0.72 for WHO, 0.71 for stage, 0.66 for grade, and 0.76 for stage combined with grade. Conclusion: Accurate prognostic information can be obtained by combining tumor size and metastases with simple grading information based on necrosis and mitotic rate. © 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrone, C. R., Tang, L. H., Tomlinson, J., Gonen, M., Hochwald, S. N., Brennan, M. F., … Allen, P. J. (2007). Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: Can the WHO classification system be simplified? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(35), 5609–5615. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9809

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free