Adjacent dental implants classification based on restorative design

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is controversy in the literature regarding the indicated retentive mechanism for implant-supported crowns. When adjacent implants are restored, the restoration can be screw retained, cement retained, or a combination of cement and screw retained. Adjacent implant-supported crowns can be restored as individual implant supported crowns or can be splinted. A classification system is proposed when adjacent implants are restored. The classification system describes currently available options to restore adjacent implants. Six types of prosthetic design options are proposed as Class I through Class VI. In Class I design, individual cement-retained crowns are made. In Class II, individual screw-retained crowns are fabricated. Class III involves fabrication of individual screw-retrievable/cement-retained crowns. Class IV prosthetic design involves splinted cement-retained implant crowns. Class V prosthetic design involves splinted screw-retained crowns, and Class VI involves splinted screw-retrievable/cement-retained implant supported crowns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Proussaefs, P., AlHelal, A., Taleb, A., & Kattadiyil, M. T. (2017, October 1). Adjacent dental implants classification based on restorative design. Journal of Oral Implantology. Allen Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00078

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free