The right to know: Ethical implications of antibody testing for healthcare workers and overlooked societal implications

4Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

After the initial surge in cases of coronavirus (COVID-19), the outbreak has been managed differently in different countries. In the USA, it has been managed in many different ways between states, cities and even counties. This disparity is slowly becoming more and more pronounced with the advent of antibody testing. Although many argue over the potential merits of antibody testing as an immunity passport to allow the economy to restart, there are other implications that stand at the heart of the bioethical debate that are often overlooked. Particularly with COVID-19, there are many uncertainties and the discourse alone of antibodies presumes misinformation that may outweigh the epidemiological benefits of antibody testing. Although this paper does not seek to eliminate antibody testing, it does highlight the need for appropriate counselling both on a personal level with each patient but on a more global level. This moral standard of appropriate education is key to allowing the continued autonomy needed during this pandemic.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vakharia, K. (2021). The right to know: Ethical implications of antibody testing for healthcare workers and overlooked societal implications. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12), E74. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106467

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free