Transcriptional profiling of chromosome 17 quantitative trait loci for carbohydrate and total calorie intake in a mouse congenic strain reveals candidate genes and pathways

17Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background/Aims: The genetic basis for ingestive behaviors is virtually unknown. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for carbohydrate and energy intake map to mouse chromosome 17 and were previously confirmed by a congenic strain bearing CAST/Ei (CAST) donor segment on the C57BL/6J (B6) background. Methods: We used microarray technology to facilitate gene identification. Gene expression was compared between the B6.CAST-17 (BC-17) congenic and B6 strains in two diets: (1) chow, and (2) carbohydrate/protein vs. fat/protein. Results: Within the QTL and unique to macronutrient selection, Agpat1 (acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 1) was differentially expressed in hypothalamus. Irrespective of diet, the gene with the highest fold difference in congenic mice was trefoil factor 3 (Tff3) in liver. Several genes involved in fat metabolism were decreased in carbohydrate-preferring congenic mice, while genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism were increased. In particular, the glyoxalase pathway was enhanced including Glo1, Glo2, and dLDH. Higher expression of Glo1 mRNA in BC-17 congenic mice corresponded to increased protein expression revealed by Western blot, and to higher GLO1 activity in blood. Conclusion: These genes represent new candidates for nutrient intake phenotypes. We propose that increased GLO1 in the BC-17 strain supports its need to protect against dietary oxidants resulting from high carbohydrate intake. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kumar, K. G., & Smith Richards, B. K. (2008). Transcriptional profiling of chromosome 17 quantitative trait loci for carbohydrate and total calorie intake in a mouse congenic strain reveals candidate genes and pathways. Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics, 1(4), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113657

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free