LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for evaluating moral reasoning in large language models

6Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study establishes a novel framework for systematically evaluating the moral reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) as they increasingly integrate into critical societal domains. Current assessment methodologies lack the precision needed to evaluate nuanced ethical decision-making in AI systems, creating significant accountability gaps. Our framework addresses this challenge by quantifying alignment with human ethical standards through three dimensions: foundational moral principles, reasoning robustness, and value consistency across diverse scenarios. This approach enables precise identification of ethical strengths and weaknesses in LLMs, facilitating targeted improvements and stronger alignment with societal values. To promote transparency and collaborative advancement in ethical AI development, we are publicly releasing both our benchmark datasets and evaluation codebase at https://github.com/The-Responsible-AI-Initiative/LLM_Ethics_Benchmark.git.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiao, J., Afroogh, S., Murali, A., Chen, K., Atkinson, D., & Dhurandhar, A. (2025). LLM ethics benchmark: a three-dimensional assessment system for evaluating moral reasoning in large language models. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18489-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free