Abstract
In this essay I explore the phenomenon of “purposiveness without a purpose” in Kant’s account of aesthetic judgments. I begin by considering what Kant means by purposiveness in general, and then I analyze the specific “purposiveness without a purpose” that belongs to aesthetic judgments. I analyze the purposiveness without a purpose of the beautiful first in terms of space and then in terms of time. The essay concludes with a consideration of how purposiveness without a purpose makes beauty resistant to thought.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dalton, S. (2015). How Beauty Disrupts Space, Time and Thought: Purposiveness Without a Purpose in Kant’s Critique of Judgment. E-LOGOS, 22(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.e-logos.409
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.