‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners’

39Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement when a general practitioner and subsequently a specialist (radiologist/gynecologist) performed point-of-care ultrasound examinations for certain abdominal and gynecological conditions of low to moderate complexity. Design: A prospective study of inter-rater reliability and agreement. Setting: Patients were recruited and initially scanned in general practice. The validation examinations were conducted in a hospital setting. Subjects: A convenient sample of 114 patients presenting with abdominal pain or discomfort, possible pregnancy or known risk factors toward abdominal aortic aneurism were included. Main outcome measures: Inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic and percentage agreement) between ultrasound examinations by general practitioner and specialist for the following conditions: gallstones, ascites, abdominal aorta >5 cm, intrauterine pregnancy and gestational age. Results: An overall Kappa value of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87–0.98) was obtained. Ascites, abdominal aortic diameter >5cm, and intrauterine pregnancy showed Kappa values of 1. Conclusion: Our study showed that general practitioners performing point-of-care ultrasound examinations with low-to-moderate complexity had a very high rate of inter-rater agreement compared with specialists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindgaard, K., & Riisgaard, L. (2017). ‘Validation of ultrasound examinations performed by general practitioners.’ Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 35(3), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1358437

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free