Continuous auditory monitoring - How much information do we register?

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have studied response times of 30 anaesthetists to a standardized episode of arterial oxygen desaturation in a simulated patient, randomized to the use of either a fixed or variable pitch pulse oximeter. We wished to determine if a variable auditory signal was important in detecting adverse events. A variable pitch pulse signal had a shorter time to recognition of desaturation (P < 0.0001), with a mean response time of 32 s, compared with 129 s for the fixed pitch signal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Craven, R. M., & McIndoe, A. K. (1999). Continuous auditory monitoring - How much information do we register? British Journal of Anaesthesia, 83(5), 747–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/83.5.747

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free