Beyond Blast Injury: Occupational Hygiene, Safety, and Toxicology Considerations for Mixed-Metal and Energetic-Chemical Exposures to Explosive Ordnance Disposal Personnel

Abstract

Explosive ordnance (EO), including AXO (abandoned explosive ordnance), IEDs (improvised explosives devices), and UXO (unexploded ordnance), are widely recognised for their blast and fragmentation hazards, but they also represent a persistent and under-addressed source of occupational chemical exposure for explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) personnel. EOD core activities liberate mixed metals and energetic chemicals, resulting in exposures that are multi-route (inhalation of dusts and fumes, dermal loading amplified by sweat and glove occlusion, and ingestion via hand-to-mouth transfer during eating, drinking, or smoking) and multi-temporal (repeated low-dose background plus task-driven spikes), as well as chemically complex. Clinically, this can present as syndromic overlap across acute and chronic domains, with symptoms that are easily misattributed to heat stress, dehydration, infection, or fatigue. Acute effects of concern include neurotoxic presentations (headache, dizziness, confusion, tremor, and seizure), respiratory and mucosal irritation following dust or fume events, gastrointestinal symptoms, and patterns suggestive of acute hepatic or renal stress, particularly when high-intensity tasks occur in hot environments that compound physiologic strain. Chronic outcomes relevant to repeatedly exposed EOD personnel include renal function decline, neurocognitive effects that can degrade operational decision making and safety, persistent haematologic abnormalities, and endocrine disruption signals, with long-latency risks requiring cautious interpretation given sparse longitudinal data and confounding co-exposures. This review synthesises the current evidence base through an EOD lens and translates it into pragmatic clinical and programmatic actions: task-based exposure characterisation; tiered biomonitoring and medical surveillance aligned to operational tempo; incident-triggered assessment pathways after high-residue events; and prevention strategies that work under field constraints, including contamination control zones, hygiene enforcement, glove and respiratory protection optimisation, tool and vehicle decontamination, and measures to prevent secondary transfer and take-home exposure. The central takeaway is practical: EOD programs can reduce morbidity and improve readiness by treating explosive ordnance as a chemical mixture exposure problem, adopting mixture-aware clinical triage, and embedding surveillance and controls that match how EOD work is actually performed.