The number of hypothalamic hypocretin (orexin) neurons is not affected in Prader-Willi syndrome

89Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: Narcoleptic patients with cataplexy have a general loss of hypocretin (orexin) in the lateral hypothalamus, possibly due to an autoimmune-mediated degeneration of the hypocretin neurons. In addition to excessive daytime sleepiness, Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients may show narcolepsy-like symptoms, such as sleep-onset rapid eye movement sleep and cataplexy, independent of obesity-related sleep disturbances, which suggests a disorder of the hypocretin neurons. Objective: We hypothesized that the narcolepsy-like symptoms in PWS are caused by a decline in the number of hypocretin neurons. Design: We estimated the number of hypocretin neurons in postmortem hypothalami using immunocytochemistry and an image analysis system. Setting: This study was conducted at the Netherlands Institute for Brain Research. Patients: Eight PWS adults, three PWS infants, and 11 controls were studied. Main Outcome Measure: The total number of hypocretin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus was measured. Results: There was no significant difference in the total number of hypocretin-containing neurons among the seven PWS patients (in whom sufficient hypothalamic material was available to quantify total cell number) and seven age-matched controls, either in adults or in infants. A significant decline with age was found in adult PWS patients (r = -0.9; P = 0.037). Conclusions: We conclude that a decrease in the number of hypocretin neurons does not play a major role in the occurrence of narcolepsy-like symptoms in PWS. Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fronczek, R., Lammers, G. J., Balesar, R., Unmehopa, U. A., & Swaab, D. F. (2005). The number of hypothalamic hypocretin (orexin) neurons is not affected in Prader-Willi syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 90(9), 5466–5470. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0296

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free