How to Begin, Again. Relational Embodiment in Time Arts & Anthropology

  • Reichert A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper proceeds from ethnographic fieldwork with the Chicago-based performance art group Every house has a door. I analyse the performer’s aim to engage with the past in a sensuous and embodied manner and I discuss the practice of cross-temporal collective relationality, which challenges notions of embodiment as being limited to an individual “body proper” (Farquhar/Lock 2007). While forms of relationality are central to artistic research and performance, I remain critical of their immediate political potential. I explicate this argument by discussing Every house’s practice with respect to contributions in relational aesthetics (Bourriaud 1997, Bishop 2004). Emerging out of my critical engagement with Bourriaud, I propose an understanding of relationality which is neither built on individual personhood nor immediately politically desirable. Instead, and emerging from fieldwork with Every house, I suggest that embodied relationality can be understood as foregoing individual experience. While this kind of relationality can be emancipatory, its normativity has to be explained with care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reichert, A.-S. (2016). How to Begin, Again. Relational Embodiment in Time Arts & Anthropology. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia, (Vol. 5, No 1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.4000/cadernosaa.1040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free