Phase I/II study of sagopilone (ZK-EPO) plus carboplatin in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

11Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Sagopilone is the first fully synthetic epothilone in clinical development and has demonstrated promising preclinical activity. This phase I/II, prospective, open-label trial investigated the efficacy and safety of sagopilone plus carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: In phase I (dose-escalation stage), patients with OC recurring at least 6 months after platinum-containing chemotherapy received 3-h infusions of sagopilone (initial dose of 12 mg m -2) followed by carboplatin every 3 weeks, for 2-6 treatment courses. Patients enrolled in phase II received 3-h infusions of 16 mg m -2 sagopilone. Efficacy was assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modRECIST) and Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup CA125 criteria. The safety and tolerability of sagopilone were also evaluated. Results: In all, 45 patients received sagopilone at 12 mg m -2 or 16 mg m -2. There were 29 confirmed tumour responses (21 modRECIST and 8 CA125) across both treatment groups, indicating that the primary objective of the study was reached. The main adverse events (AEs) reported were peripheral neuropathy (75.6%), fatigue (71.1%) and nausea (64.4%). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 35 patients (77.8%). No deaths related to the study drug were reported. Conclusion: Sagopilone in combination with carboplatin was effective and toxicities were manageable in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive OC. © 2012 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McMeekin, S., Patel, R., Verschraegen, C., Celano, P., Burke, J., Plaxe, S., … Schmelter, T. (2012). Phase I/II study of sagopilone (ZK-EPO) plus carboplatin in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 106(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.499

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free