High-grade B-cell lymphomas with TdT expression: a diagnostic and classification dilemma

Abstract

Mature B-cell neoplasms and immature or precursor B-cell neoplasms need to be distinguished because these patients usually require different therapeutic approaches. B-cell neoplasms that express TdT without unequivocal other features of immaturity may therefore present a diagnostic challenge. We describe 13 patients with TdT-positive aggressive B-cell lymphoma. The clinicopathologic features of these patients were highly heterogeneous, but for the purpose of this study we grouped these cases as follows: (1) de novo high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double-hit or triple-hit lymphoma) with TdT expression. In this group we included two cases of de novo composite lymphoma in which there were components of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and TdT-positive blastic B-cell lymphoma; (2) TdT-positive aggressive B-cell lymphoma arising in patients who previously had follicular lymphoma; (3) initial relapse of TdT-negative aggressive B-cell lymphoma in patients who previously had follicular lymphoma, followed by relapses in which the neoplasm acquired TdT expression; and (4) mature B-cell lymphomas that acquired TdT expression at relapse. This group included one case of EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and one case of pleomorphic variant mantle cell lymphoma. All patients in this study had an aggressive clinical course and a dismal outcome despite appropriate therapy. Rather than “squeezing” these cases into current World Health Organization classification categories, we suggest the use of a descriptive term such as high-grade B-cell lymphoma with TdT expression. In these tumors, the cytogenetic findings and poor prognosis of this patient subgroup suggest that these neoplasms need to be distinguished from B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Segregation of these neoplasms also may foster additional research on these neoplasms.