Is the modified Ponseti method effective in treating atypical and complex clubfoot? A systematic review

11Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: In 2006, Ponseti modified the standard technique to treat cases of “atypical” and “complex” clubfoot. To determine the outcomes of Ponseti’s modified method to treat complex idiopathic clubfoot patients, we asked the following: (1) What is the deformity correction success rate? (2) What is the relapse rate after the correction? (3) What is the incidence of complications? Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review by searching the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to March 1, 2021. All studies on idiopathic, complex, and atypical clubfoot that assessed Ponseti’s modified technique were included. Of 699 identified articles, ten met the inclusion criteria. The mean index for non-randomized studies score for the included studies was 11.8 ± 1.7. Results: Early detection of the deformity and modifying the standard protocol, as described by Ponseti, resulted in a high rate of success. Initial correction occurred in all children, with a mean ankle dorsiflexion of 15°. Relapse occurred often ranging between 10.5 and 55%. The incidence of complications associated with the modified Ponseti method ranged from 6 to 30%. Conclusions: Studies using the modified Ponseti technique have shown high initial correction rates and a smaller number of relapses. However, studies with prospective designs and long-term follow-up are required to conclude whether these observations are due to properly performing the modified method or if higher rates of relapse increase with further follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Mohrej, O. A., Alshaalan, F. N., & Alhussainan, T. S. (2021, October 1). Is the modified Ponseti method effective in treating atypical and complex clubfoot? A systematic review. International Orthopaedics. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05092-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free