How Do Efficient Coding Strategies Depend on Origins of Noise in Neural Circuits?

32Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Neural circuits reliably encode and transmit signals despite the presence of noise at multiple stages of processing. The efficient coding hypothesis, a guiding principle in computational neuroscience, suggests that a neuron or population of neurons allocates its limited range of responses as efficiently as possible to best encode inputs while mitigating the effects of noise. Previous work on this question relies on specific assumptions about where noise enters a circuit, limiting the generality of the resulting conclusions. Here we systematically investigate how noise introduced at different stages of neural processing impacts optimal coding strategies. Using simulations and a flexible analytical approach, we show how these strategies depend on the strength of each noise source, revealing under what conditions the different noise sources have competing or complementary effects. We draw two primary conclusions: (1) differences in encoding strategies between sensory systems—or even adaptational changes in encoding properties within a given system—may be produced by changes in the structure or location of neural noise, and (2) characterization of both circuit nonlinearities as well as noise are necessary to evaluate whether a circuit is performing efficiently.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brinkman, B. A. W., Weber, A. I., Rieke, F., & Shea-Brown, E. (2016). How Do Efficient Coding Strategies Depend on Origins of Noise in Neural Circuits? PLoS Computational Biology, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free