An empirical study on the smallest comfortable button/icon size on touch screen

24Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For the convenience of firefighters' decision-making and operation, touch screen display was chosen as the preferred interface for a fire information display system. Few studies were conducted to determine comfortable button/icon size on touch screens. This experiment investigated the effect of four factors on operators' performance with touch screen: 1) button size (20*20, 30*30, 40*40, and 50*50 pixels 2), spacing between buttons (0, 5, 10, and 20 pixels), 3) button/icon types (digit buttons only, picture icons only, combination), and 4) glove wearing (wearing vs. not wearing). 14 males were asked to accomplish a series of matching tasks on touch screen with the forefinger of right hand. Results showed that the spacing between buttons/icons, and wearing or not wearing a glove did not affect performance. Subjects pointed to the digit buttons faster than the other two kinds of buttons/icons. There was a significant difference among button/icon sizes. People performed best when it was equal to or bigger than 40*40 pixels. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xianghong, S., Plocher, T., & Weina, Q. (2007). An empirical study on the smallest comfortable button/icon size on touch screen. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4559 LNCS, pp. 615–621). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73287-7_71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free