CEO Compensation and US High-tech and Low-tech Firms’ Corporate Performance

  • Shim D
  • Lee J
  • Joo I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many factors contribute to the determination of top executive compensation. This paper explores and examines the systematic difference of high-tech and low-tech CEO pays. It examines the relationship between top executive compensation and an Organizational factor, a Market factor and an Accounting factor. It tests CEO's salary, bonus, and long-term compensation with respect to corporate reputation, ROE, Tobin's Q, CEO shareholding and firm size. The results show that CEOs' Salaries at high-tech firms shows a significantly positive relationship with ROE, Tobin's Q, and corporate reputation, while only corporate reputation shows a significant relationship with CEOs' salaries at low-tech firms. In addition, both the high-tech and low-tech firm executives' total compensation are significantly and positively related to Tobin's Q, and corporate reputation. Similar results are reported with Long-term compensation. In general, high-tech firms tend to use more sophisticated performance measures for the determination of CEO compensation, while low-tech firms seem to use a simple performance measure such as corporate reputation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shim, D., Lee, J., & Joo, I. K. (2009). CEO Compensation and US High-tech and Low-tech Firms’ Corporate Performance. Contemporary Management Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.1126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free