CT quantification of the heterogeneity of fibrosis boundaries in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the heterogeneity of fibrosis boundaries in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) using the Gaussian curvature analysis for evaluating disease severity and predicting survival. Methods: We retrospectively included 104 IPF patients and 52 controls who underwent baseline chest CT scans. Normal lungs below − 500 HU were segmented, and the boundary was three-dimensionally reconstructed using in-house software. Gaussian curvature analysis provided histogram features on the heterogeneity of the fibrosis boundary. We analyzed the correlations between histogram features and the gender-age-physiology (GAP) and CT fibrosis scores. We built a regression model to predict diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) using the histogram features and calculated the modified GAP (mGAP) score by replacing DLCO with the predicted DLCO. The performances of the GAP, CT-GAP, and mGAP scores were compared using 100 repeated random-split sets. Results: Patients with moderate-to-severe IPF had more numerous Gaussian curvatures at the fibrosis boundary, lower uniformity, and lower 10th to 30th percentiles of Gaussian curvature than controls or patients with mild IPF (all p < 0.0033). The 20th percentile was most significantly correlated with the GAP score (r = − 0.357; p < 0.001) and the CT fibrosis score (r = − 0.343; p = 0.001). More numerous Gaussian curvatures, higher entropy, lower uniformity, and 10th to 30th percentiles (p < 0.001–0.041) were associated with mortality. The mGAP score was comparable to the GAP and CT-GAP scores for survival prediction (mean C-indices, 0.76 vs. 0.79 vs. 0.77, respectively). Conclusions: Gaussian curvatures of fibrosis boundaries became more heterogeneous as the disease progressed, and heterogeneity was negatively associated with survival in IPF. Key Points: • Gaussian curvature of the fibrotic lung boundary was more heterogeneous in patients with moderate-to-severe IPF than those with mild IPF or normal controls. • The 20th percentile of the Gaussian curvature of the fibrosis boundary was linearly correlated with the GAP score and the CT fibrosis score. • A modified GAP score that replaced the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide with a composite measure using histogram features of the Gaussian curvature of the fibrosis boundary showed a comparable ability to predict survival to both the GAP and the CT-GAP score.

References Powered by Scopus

MARCHING CUBES: A HIGH RESOLUTION 3D SURFACE CONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM.

8305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management

6167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical practice guideline

2848Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vincamine as an agonist of G protein-coupled receptor 40 effectively ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis in mice

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantitative computed tomography and machine learning: Recent data in fibrotic interstitial lung disease and potential role in pulmonary sarcoidosis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Otilonium bromide ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis in mice through activating phosphatase PPM1A

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, J., Jung, J., Yoon, S. H., Hong, H., Kim, H., Kim, H., … Goo, J. M. (2021). CT quantification of the heterogeneity of fibrosis boundaries in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. European Radiology, 31(7), 5148–5159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07594-y

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

60%

Neuroscience 1

20%

Psychology 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0