US double-blind, controlled trials of omeprazole and amoxycillin for treatment of Helicobacter pylori

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: Widely variable Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have been reported with omeprazole/amoxycillin dual therapy, We present the first US double-blind, controlled trials of this dual therapy. Methods: Three separate studies were performed: Studies 1 and 3 included patients with an active duodenal ulcer and Study 3 included patients with a documented history of duodenal ulcer. H. pylori eradication regimens in all studies were omeprazole plus amoxycillin vs. omeprazole vs. amoxycillin for 2 weeks. Doses in Study 1 were omeprazole 40 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., and in Studies 2 and 3 they were omeprazole 20 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g t.d.s. Endoscopic biopsy tests were used for H. pylori diagnosis, and testing for H. pylori eradication was done at least 4 weeks after the completion of therapy. Amoxycillin sensitivities were performed in Study 2. Results: Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses showed that eradication rates with omeprazole/amoxycillin [ITT: 39%, 40%, 46% (n = 72, 62, 48); PP: 50%, 46%, 54% (n = 54, 52, 37)] were significantly greater than monotherapy with either omeprazole (ITT: 0-4%; PP: 0-5%) or amoxycillin (ITT: 2-5%; PP: 0-11%). No patients taking the dual therapy discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Amoxycillin resistance was not seen at baseline (n = 76) or after amoxycillin therapy (n = 56). Conclusions: Omeprazole/amoxycillin dual therapy is well tolerated but the eradication rate which can be expected in the USA is at best about 50%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laine, L., Johnson, E., Suchower, L., Ronca, P., Hwang, C., & Neil, G. (1998). US double-blind, controlled trials of omeprazole and amoxycillin for treatment of Helicobacter pylori. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 12(4), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00303.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free