Ligamentotaxis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Distal Radius Intra-Articular Fractures

  • Abdel-Ghany M
  • Tohamy T
  • Shaaban W
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of two different methods for the treatment of distal radial intra-articular frac-tures. Patients and Methods: Forty-six patients with distal radius intra-arti-cular fractures were divided into two groups. Group I included 24 patients with type C fracture treated by external fixator augmented by percutaneous K-wires. Group II included 22 patients with type C fracture treated by volar locked distal radial plate augmented by K-wires. Two patients had complex injuries necessitating double plating (sandwich). All patients were evaluated clinically by Mayo Wrist Score and radiologically by Sarmiento's radiological score. Results: Both groups reported good personal satisfaction according to Mayo Wrist Score, and the results were not statistically different between the two groups. In Group I, 19 patients (79.2%) had excellent radiological out-come and five patients (20.9%) had good radiological outcome according to Sarmiento's radiological score. In Group II, 20 patients (90.9%) had excellent outcome, and two (9.1%) had good radiological outcome; there was no or in-significant deformity. Conclusions: Complex distal radial fractures can be treated either by external fixation (ligamentotaxis) or by locked pre-contoured plating. The clinical outcome of plating and external fixator in our study did not show any statistically significant difference. The radiological outcome had no correlation with the clinical outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdel-Ghany, M., Tohamy, T. G., Shaaban, W. M., Atallah, A.-H. A., & Abdel-Rahman, T. M. (2017). Ligamentotaxis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Distal Radius Intra-Articular Fractures. Open Journal of Orthopedics, 07(01), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2017.71004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free