Two for One: Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems with Buffers Protects Terrestrial Ecosystems

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We evaluated how three widths of buffer zones on greater than or equal to 100-ha wetlands (240, 300, and 390 m) and rivers (10, 20, and 30 m) would help meet watershed conservation goals in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA, and whether doing so also would protect each of the predominant types of terrestrial natural communities across the landscape. The use of buffer zones (even the narrowest widths assessed) around wetlands and riparian zones met or exceeded conservation targets in 75% of watersheds and greater than or equal to 85% of subwatersheds evaluated. Wetlands and riparian zones with buffers captured each of the predominant types of terrestrial natural community in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, but not proportionately to their availability across the entire landscape. Our work demonstrates that a landscape-conservation approach focused on wetlands and riparian zones with buffers can conserve terrestrial, wetland, and riparian ecosystems across Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and may also be applicable in other areas where mapping of wetlands and rivers occurs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denryter, K., Brown, P. W., Denryter, K., & Brown, P. W. (2021). Two for One: Conservation of Aquatic Ecosystems with Buffers Protects Terrestrial Ecosystems. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 12(2), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-21-005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free