Seed-based event trigger labeling: How far can event descriptions get us?

38Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The task of event trigger labeling is typi-cally addressed in the standard supervised setting: triggers for each target event type are annotated as training data, based on annotation guidelines. We propose an al-ternative approach, which takes the exam-ple trigger terms mentioned in the guide-lines as seeds, and then applies an event-independent similarity-based classifier for trigger labeling. This way we can skip manual annotation for new event types, while requiring only minimal annotated training data for few example events at system setup. Our method is evaluated on the ACE-2005 dataset, achieving 5.7% Fx improvement over a state-of-the-art super-vised system which uses the full training data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bronstein, O., Dagan, I., Li, Q., Ji, H., & Frank, A. (2015). Seed-based event trigger labeling: How far can event descriptions get us? In ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 372–376). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p15-2061

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free