Comparison of two methods of fibrescope-guided tracheal intubation

48Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared intubation time and cardiovascular effects of fibrescope-guided orotracheal intubation aided by the Berman 11 Intubating Airway with those of the tongue traction method of fibreoptic intubation and with conventional Macintosh intubation. We studied 75 patients who received a standard general anaesthetic which included non-depolarizing neuromuscular block; they were allocated randomly to one of the three groups immediately before intubation. The mean time required to effect Berman airway intubation (34.9 s) was similar to that required for tongue traction intubation (35.3 s) and significantly greater than that required for Macintosh intubation (11.7 s). The cardiovascular responses to both types of fibreoptic intubation were significantly greater and more prolonged than those of Macintosh intubation. There were no significant differences between the responses to the two fibreoptic techniques. Haemodynamic effects should be considered when performing fibrescope-guided tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia and, when necessary, appropriate measures should be taken to minimize them. © 1991 Copyright: 1991 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J. E., Mackenzie, A. A., & Scott-knight, V. C. E. (1991). Comparison of two methods of fibrescope-guided tracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 66(5), 546–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/66.5.546

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free